I went 'old school' here with Astrophotography Tool and a PC to test out an older rig of mine that consists of a old modified for astrophotography Canon 450D DSLR and a olde gold coloured(these days they come out the box black) 80mm Skywatcher ED80 Pro Refractor with an Orion 0.80 Flattner Reducer. With this rig I mainly intend to do Lunar photography with regardless so this deep sky test is just a bonus.
Here you can see the rig which includes an old Skywatcher HEQ5 mount which has been modified from cogs to belts to provide quieter and smoother operation.
Below for comparison is an image of the same area taken Friday October 31st 2014. It was taken with the same camera and telescope and consists of just 7 x 180 second(3 minute) frames.
The difference in the first instance is 98 minutes of exposure above versus 21 minutes below. The result here is much better signal to noise ratio allowing more lattitude to enhance the image in post processing
In the second instance, mainly due to the belt modifications in the mount, is a sub-arcsecond autoguiding variance above verses a 2 arcsecond below. The result here are much tighter stars and spatial detail in the nebula itself. As most telescope mounts are vaguely inaccuate in tracking the autoguiding locks onto individual stars to keep the image locked in the frame and send adjustments to the mount to keep the stars from trailing.
In the third instance, above the image has been post processed in Pixinsight which is this world's most advanced post processing tool for amateur astrophotographers. Below I used a program, Nebulosity, and some tweeks in Photoshop which while great and inexpensive tool in it's day(at least Nebulosity was) there was limited ability to access and enhance the total data in the image.



No comments:
Post a Comment